Let´s wait for Martin to have a say about this. the price to pay for it should not be very high. XDCAM EX HD 422 is one of the most compatible of all. VMix needs a true crossplatform container compatible. Yes i use adobe premiere pro that "eats" vMis recordings without any transcode.īut what about avid media composer and final cut pro X for example ?ĪVI TS MKV and Mpeg are not really cross platform containers. Transcode always degrade the video quality. Editors will require the BlueCodecPack Licence on the IngeSTore capture station to write MXF XDCAM 422 50Mb and AVC-Intra 100 files for Premiere Pro to read. Why not let vMix grow even better to professional standards ?. VMis pro is more expensive because it has more features. I would prefer Martin to support the most common codecs/containers used and suggest that if you have particular one-off needs for a recording format that you invest in the appropriate transcoding tool. My guess is that each one of these will attract a licencing fee which then impacts on the base cost of vMix and/or any other tool. Each container then supports/contains different codecs. Premiere Pro can export MXF files containing the MPEG-2 essence items that comply with the XDCAM HD format used by such systems as Avid Unity. From reading the article it seems that there are at least four or five variants of the MXF container, each proprietary.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |